What's in it for me

Five participants around building data.

Each participant has a recognisable data pain, a buildinglinks promise, concrete use cases and the evidence needed to share data in a controlled way.

Installation / FM / BMS

Connectors and mapping instead of bespoke work.

Participant 01

Owner

Control over portfolio data without new lock-in.

For institutional owners and owner-occupiers, building data sits scattered across BMS portals, FM providers, meters, tenants and reporting chains. buildinglinks makes that data usable in a controlled way for ESG, maintenance, comfort and optimisation without the owner losing control.

Pain

Where it gets stuck today

Manual consolidation from dozens of portals and exports.
No portfolio-wide comparison without normalising measurement points, units and floor area.
CSRD, GRESB and EU Taxonomy substantiation demands auditable data series, not loose spreadsheets.

Use cases

What buildinglinks makes possible

Automated data collection for ESG and CSRD reporting.
Portfolio-wide energy benchmarking with validated metering data.
Green lease monitoring with revocable tenant authorisation.

Participant 02

Manager

Set up once, serve multiple owners.

Property managers and FM providers sit between owner, tenant and supplier. They have to deliver the same kind of data over and over in different formats, deadlines and portals. buildinglinks makes management on behalf of the entitled party explicit and revocable.

Pain

Where it gets stuck today

One manager, dozens of owners and just as many export formats.
Service charges, maintenance and energy are traced manually from different systems.
When management changes hands, history, context and access rights vanish into export projects.

Use cases

What buildinglinks makes possible

A standardised connector between manager and multiple owners.
Delegated, purpose-bound access on behalf of the owner.
An auditable CSRD and ISAE 3402 data flow from the same source.

Participant 03

Tenant / CREM

Data from leased buildings, with verifiable provenance.

Corporate tenants have climate targets, comfort requirements and CSRD obligations, but the metering data often sits with the landlord, property manager or BMS vendor. buildinglinks makes data access from leased buildings technically feasible and auditable.

Pain

Where it gets stuck today

Scope 3 data from leased buildings arrives late, manually and in varying formats.
Service charges are hard to verify without the underlying consumption series.
Comfort complaints stay subjective while temperature, CO₂ and air-quality data sits in the landlord's BMS.

Use cases

What buildinglinks makes possible

Automated Scope 3 data collection from leased buildings.
Making green lease arrangements technically enforceable via authorisation, delegation and purpose binding.
Linking comfort monitoring to lease and SLA arrangements.

Participant 04

EMS / analytics / ESCo

Faster access to reliable building data for optimisation and performance evidence.

EMS vendors, analytics platforms and ESCos deliver value on top of data, but lose time on BMS integrations, point mapping and unclear authority. buildinglinks makes access repeatable under the conditions of the entitled party.

Pain

Where it gets stuck today

Every new customer is another integration project with different protocols and point names.
Unclear data ownership blocks onboarding: who is allowed to grant access?
Data quality, units, time zones and metadata have to be cleaned up per building.

Use cases

What buildinglinks makes possible

A standardised BMS data connection with semantic point mapping.
A formal data request on behalf of the building owner via trust and delegation.
Publishing derived optimisation, M&V and flexibility signals as your own data service.

Participant 05

Installation / FM / BMS

Delivering data as a repeatable service instead of project-specific exports.

Installers, FM providers and BMS vendors hold the operational data that owners and service providers need. buildinglinks makes delivery, handover and evidencing repeatable without every request becoming a new export project.

Pain

Where it gets stuck today

Point-mapping and commissioning knowledge lives in heads, project files and proprietary systems.
SLA, maintenance and fault evidence is reconstructed after the fact from CAFM, CMMS and BMS.
Data Act and BACS questions lead to ad-hoc exports and legal uncertainty without a standard route.

Use cases

What buildinglinks makes possible

Handing over commissioning, as-built and point-mapping data via a connector.
Making maintenance logs and work orders available to owner and FM.
Auditable SLA and BACS evidencing with a transaction log.

Which data stream will you pick up first?

Start small: one building cluster, one data product or one service provider. Scaling up then becomes a repeatable pattern.

Book a demo